Main Menu

Contact Info

Sales@ChillServices.com
 

 

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Flash Image Rotator Module by Joomlashack.
Image 1 Title
Image 2 Title
Image 3 Title
Image 4 Title
Image 5 Title



Feb 28
2008

Euronet ends MoneyGram pursuit

Posted by Mark Hill in POSmyblogFinancial ServicesElectronic CommerceChill ServicesBuzzBankingATM

avatar

E-payments processor and ATM operator Euronet Worldwide says it will not launch a new bid to acquire fund transfer outfit Moneygram due to the slowdown in the debt and equity markets.

 

 

Euronet made an unsolicited $1.65 billion bid to acquire MoneyGram in December 2007. The stock offer valued MoneyGram at $20 per share - some 40% higher than the stock's price at the time - but was rebuffed by MoneyGram.

 

Earlier this month MoneyGram agreed to be bought out by a consortium led by private equity firm Thomas H Lee Partners and Goldman Sachs, which is making a $710 million equity investment in the company. However the agreement includes a "go shop" provision which allows MoneyGram to shop around for another deal, including from Euronet, until 7 March.

 

Last week, in a statement accompanying its earning release, Euronet said it was considering making a new bid for MoneyGram, despite losing around $14 million on its investment in the money transfer firm.

 

Euronet said at the end of 2007 it purchased 1.3 million MoneyGram shares for $20 million. But the trading price for the stock dived after MoneyGram reported major losses following the subprime mortgage crisis. Euronet said the aggregate value of its investment in MoneyGram as of 19 February was reduced to just $6.1 million.

 

Euronet now says it has "ceased discussions" with MoneyGram regarding a potential acquisition.

 

"Although the acquisition has tremendous industrial logic, and may be quite beneficial to MoneyGram's shareholders, the current debt and equity markets will not enable us to acquire MoneyGram on terms that would give our Euronet shareholders the accretion and return on investment that we would require," says Euronet chairman and CEO Michael Brown in a statement.

 



Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment
Mark Hill: Stop supporting companies that do not self regulate
I believe I recall seeing, or hearing the same thing either at an industry conference or on a blog – Unfortunately, morality and good business practices cannot be mandated, without impacting our freedoms.

Just like watching an objectionable TV program, we as consumers can always change the channel of a show we do not agree with, and stop supporting companies that promote those types of shows.

Likewise, we can also “Stop” supporting companies that do not self regulate these types of issues.

I’ve not heard stories like this in probably to 2 or 3 years, so something must be occurring in the industry, or you would see the blogs and media pick up on these type of events, especially when we have a politically heated election that is vying for the Hispanic, and under banked vote.

Thanks for your comments.
1

March 04, 2008
Bill Buiers: Tighter Regs
Like most alternate financial service companies, these types of companies are not regulated, which means that abuses can be committed on the general public, or the unbanked population in general, and the victims have little recourse. Both Money Gram and Western Union have a history of agents charging fees above the industry average. With all of the graft, and near non-existent regulation throughout this industry, it’s hard to believe that Money Gram is losing money.

I recall a newspaper article several years ago about an illegal immigrant living in the west coast sending $1,000 to a money transfer agent, to pay a Coyote to get his mother across the Mexican Border. After paying some $30 or $40 dollars in fees to transmit the money through a local agent in Mexico - another $100 was taken directly as a fee by the agent.

The Coyote took the money and left the mother in the middle of the dessert. When the Border Patrol found her, according to the article, she was dehydrated, and near death.

Don't get me wrong, I am not advocating illegal entry into this country, nor am I condoning the actions of either the mother or the son. Hopefully my comments won’t start a thread about immigration either legal or illegal, the point is that I don't think that US Federal Regulations would have prevented this tragedy, but stronger penalties for money exchange companies in the US that do not regulate their agents abroad may have prevented this.


2

February 28, 2008

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy


Legal Notice   |  Safe Harbor   |  Rights 

valid xhtml | valid CSS